Essay On Obama
Chelsea Manning's Sentence Commuted in Unjust Decision by Obama. Barack Obama is nothing if not consistent.
Executive Oath of Office: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my. 5 Paragraph Essay Organizer. Americans were scared and angry. The economy was spinning in reverse.
A writer returns to Cuba in search of the dying embers of an sports powerhouse. The Nobel Prize-winning economist, once one of the president’s most notable critics, on why Obama is a historic success.
He is lenient with American enemies foreign and domestic. Make no mistake, his decision to commute the remainder of Bradley (Chelsea) Manning’s jail term sends the message that soldiers can betray their nation — without regard to the lives of their brothers and sisters in arms — yet still expect to receive compassion from their government, so long as they’re “whistleblowing” on an unpopular war.
Glamour Exclusive: President Barack Obama Says, "This Is What a Feminist Looks Like". We provide excellent essay writing service 24/7. Enjoy proficient essay writing and custom writing services provided by professional academic writers.
It’s important to properly understand Manning’s case. Contrary to media framing, this was not a conventional “leak” prosecution. Instead, Manning is responsible for one of the largest security breaches in American military history. He downloaded, copied, and passed along to Wiki.
Leaks several hundred thousand files that comprehensively detailed American military and diplomatic activities in Iraq, Afghanistan, and beyond. These files not only disclosed the identities of individuals working with Americans and spotlighted vital and sensitive classified diplomatic efforts, they provided a comprehensive overview of American military operations in both Iraq and Afghanistan — including detailed descriptions of American tactics and strategies, right down to descriptions of the vehicles used in various missions, the purpose of the missions, and the targets of operations. In other words, to borrow a football analogy, it was like handing the opposition your playbook — except with lives on the line. During Manning’s trial, prosecutors introduced evidence that al- Qaeda was not only gleeful about the leak (one of its spokesmen said, “By the grace of God, the enemy’s interests are today spread all over the place”), Osama bin Laden himself “asked for and received” the “Afghanistan battlefield reports that Wiki.
Leaks published.”Moreover, unlike most leak cases, which involve the dissemination of specific, limited amounts of information, Manning’s security breach was nothing more and nothing less than a document dump. Manning, a low- level soldier, did not and could not comb through his hundreds of thousands of documents to mitigate any possible harm or prevent any possible loss of life. Instead, he transmitted them en masse for publication. Manning claims he disclosed the documents for the purpose of stimulating “worldwide discussion, debates, and reforms.” But that’s not his decision to make. He disclosed the nation’s secrets without even knowing whether those secrets could hurt or possibly kill the men and women with whom he served or the men and women who worked with American forces. His actions were worse than reckless.
He acted with callous disregard and utter indifference to human life. No matter how troubled he was during his Iraq deployment, he was fully aware of the laws and regulations that governed his conduct, and he knowingly and deliberately violated those laws. His defenders like to point out that the prosecution didn’t prove that anyone died directly as a result of Manning’s security breach. Yet as our own Andrew Mc. Carthy notes today, “in cases involving classified information, the government frequently cannot reveal — let alone prosecute — the damage done.” The very act of revealing the extent of the damage can disclose more classified information. In fact, the damage is still being done — as the enemy continues to use the information about American tactics to adjust its own operations and methods. Since his arrest and imprisonment, Manning has disclosed that he is transgender and now goes by the name “Chelsea.” This has stirred up considerable sympathy for him from some in the media.
The New York Times even phrased the commutation as having “rescued” Manning from an “uncertain future as a transgender woman incarcerated at the men’s military prison at Fort Leavenworth.”One does not have to engage in yet another wearying debate about gender identity to understand that Manning — regardless of his self- identification — betrayed his nation. Definition Essay On Obesity. No matter how troubled he was during his Iraq deployment, he was fully aware of the laws and regulations that governed his conduct, and he knowingly and deliberately violated those laws. Writing A Thesis Statement For An Essay.
Finally, it is important to understand that Manning had already been treated with considerable mercy before Obama commuted his sentence. Manning was convicted on 1. Uniform Code of Military Justice, pled guilty to three, and was acquitted of two. Short English Essays For Children.
Prosecutors sought a 6. This was itself lenient, but not lenient enough for the Obama administration. Manning will soon walk free, ultimately serving a sentence no longer than that of a garden- variety domestic felon.
In the meantime, across the globe, our enemies better understand our military tactics, friends who’ve risked their lives to fight jihad live in fear, and diplomatic trust is breached. Manning’s commutation was worse than foolish. It was unjust, and it broke faith with America’s warriors.
The price paid for betrayal proved to be low indeed.
Sadie, 1. 1- Year- Old Transgender Girl, Writes Essay In Response To Obama's Inauguration Speech. Barack Obama made history on Monday when he became the first president to speak about the Stonewall uprising and the gay rights struggle during an inaugural speech. While many in the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community were thrilled with the mentions, an 1. Sadie wondered why the President didn't directly address trans people, too.(SEE A SLIDESHOW OF PHOTOS OF SADIE BELOW). Transgender people are not allowed the freedom to do things everyone else does, like go to the doctor, go to school, get a job, and even make friends.
Transgender kids like me are not allowed to go to most schools because the teachers think we are different from everyone else. The schools get afraid of how they will talk with the other kids' parents, and transgender kids are kept secret or told not to come there anymore. Kids are told not to be friends with transgender kids, which makes us very lonely and sad. When they grow up, transgender adults have a hard time getting a job because the boss thinks the customers will be scared away. Doctors are afraid of treating transgender patients because they don't know how to take care of them, and some doctors don't really want to help them. Transgender patients like me travel to other states to see a good doctor. It would be a better world if everyone knew that transgender people have the same hopes and dreams as everyone else.
We like to make friends and want to go to school. Transgender people want to get good jobs and go to doctors like they are exactly the same. It really isn't that hard to like transgender people because we are like everyone else. She was home schooled until this year and is now in fifth grade and attending public school.
A vegan, she loves anything that . She listens to Lady Gaga, Pink and Justin Bieber and wants to work for Green Peace when she grows up. She also wants to be a mom. Though Sadie has been openly discriminated against, her mother says that she . When she chats with people, she introduces herself as, 'Hi, I'm Sadie, my favorite color is pink, I'm vegan, and I'm transgender.
My dream for her is that she will be happy. I just want her to be happy.
What Happened to Obama’s Passion? In that context, Americans needed their president to tell them a story that made sense of what they had just been through, what caused it, and how it was going to end. They needed to hear that he understood what they were feeling, that he would track down those responsible for their pain and suffering, and that he would restore order and safety. What they were waiting for, in broad strokes, was a story something like this: “I know you’re scared and angry. Many of you have lost your jobs, your homes, your hope. This was a disaster, but it was not a natural disaster. It was made by Wall Street gamblers who speculated with your lives and futures.
It was made by conservative extremists who told us that if we just eliminated regulations and rewarded greed and recklessness, it would all work out. But it didn’t work out. And it didn’t work out 8. But we learned something from our grandparents about how to fix it, and we will draw on their wisdom. We will restore business confidence the old- fashioned way: by putting money back in the pockets of working Americans by putting them back to work, and by restoring integrity to our financial markets and demanding it of those who want to run them. I can’t promise that we won’t make mistakes along the way. But I can promise you that they will be honest mistakes, and that your government has your back again.” A story isn’t a policy.
But that simple narrative — and the policies that would naturally have flowed from it — would have inoculated against much of what was to come in the intervening two and a half years of failed government, idled factories and idled hands. That story would have made clear that the president understood that the American people had given Democrats the presidency and majorities in both houses of Congress to fix the mess the Republicans and Wall Street had made of the country, and that this would not be a power- sharing arrangement. It would have made clear that the problem wasn’t tax- and- spend liberalism or the deficit — a deficit that didn’t exist until George W. Bush gave nearly $2 trillion in tax breaks largely to the wealthiest Americans and squandered $1 trillion in two wars. Photo. Credit. Edel Rodriguez And perhaps most important, it would have offered a clear, compelling alternative to the dominant narrative of the right, that our problem is not due to spending on things like the pensions of firefighters, but to the fact that those who can afford to buy influence are rewriting the rules so they can cut themselves progressively larger slices of the American pie while paying less of their fair share for it.
But there was no story — and there has been none since. In similar circumstances, Franklin D. Roosevelt offered Americans a promise to use the power of his office to make their lives better and to keep trying until he got it right. Writing A Essay Example. Beginning in his first inaugural address, and in the fireside chats that followed, he explained how the crash had happened, and he minced no words about those who had caused it. He promised to do something no president had done before: to use the resources of the United States to put Americans directly to work, building the infrastructure we still rely on today.
He swore to keep the people who had caused the crisis out of the halls of power, and he made good on that promise. In a 1. 93. 6 speech at Madison Square Garden, he thundered, “Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me — and I welcome their hatred.”When Barack Obama stepped into the Oval Office, he stepped into a cycle of American history, best exemplified by F. D. R. After a great technological revolution or a major economic transition, as when America changed from a nation of farmers to an urban industrial one, there is often a period of great concentration of wealth, and with it, a concentration of power in the wealthy. That’s what we saw in 1.
At some point that power is exercised so injudiciously, and the lives of so many become so unbearable, that a period of reform ensues — and a charismatic reformer emerges to lead that renewal. In that sense, Teddy Roosevelt started the cycle of reform his cousin picked up 3. America’s land and wildlife, creating the modern environmental movement. Those were the shoes — that was the historic role — that Americans elected Barack Obama to fill.
The president is fond of referring to “the arc of history,” paraphrasing the Rev. Quotes For School Students. Martin Luther King Jr.’s famous statement that “the arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” But with his deep- seated aversion to conflict and his profound failure to understand bully dynamics — in which conciliation is always the wrong course of action, because bullies perceive it as weakness and just punch harder the next time — he has broken that arc and has likely bent it backward for at least a generation. When Dr. King spoke of the great arc bending toward justice, he did not mean that we should wait for it to bend. He exhorted others to put their full weight behind it, and he gave his life speaking with a voice that cut through the blistering force of water cannons and the gnashing teeth of police dogs. He preached the gospel of nonviolence, but he knew that whether a bully hid behind a club or a poll tax, the only effective response was to face the bully down, and to make the bully show his true and repugnant face in public. IN contrast, when faced with the greatest economic crisis, the greatest levels of economic inequality, and the greatest levels of corporate influence on politics since the Depression, Barack Obama stared into the eyes of history and chose to avert his gaze.
Instead of indicting the people whose recklessness wrecked the economy, he put them in charge of it. He never explained that decision to the public — a failure in storytelling as extraordinary as the failure in judgment behind it. Had the president chosen to bend the arc of history, he would have told the public the story of the destruction wrought by the dismantling of the New Deal regulations that had protected them for more than half a century. He would have offered them a counternarrative of how to fix the problem other than the politics of appeasement, one that emphasized creating economic demand and consumer confidence by putting consumers back to work. He would have had to stare down those who had wrecked the economy, and he would have had to tolerate their hatred if not welcome it.
But the arc of his temperament just didn’t bend that far. Photo. Litter, after an Obama- Biden train stop in Baltimore days before the 2. Credit. Todd Heisler/The New York Times The truly decisive move that broke the arc of history was his handling of the stimulus. The public was desperate for a leader who would speak with confidence, and they were ready to follow wherever the president led. Yet instead of indicting the economic policies and principles that had just eliminated eight million jobs, in the most damaging of the tic- like gestures of compromise that have become the hallmark of his presidency — and against the advice of multiple Nobel- Prize- winning economists — he backed away from his advisers who proposed a big stimulus, and then diluted it with tax cuts that had already been shown to be inert. The result, as predicted in advance, was a half- stimulus that half- stimulated the economy. That, in turn, led the White House to feel rightly unappreciated for having saved the country from another Great Depression but in the unenviable position of having to argue a counterfactual — that something terrible might have happened had it not half- acted.
To the average American, who was still staring into the abyss, the half- stimulus did nothing but prove that Ronald Reagan was right, that government is the problem. In fact, the average American had no idea what Democrats were trying to accomplish by deficit spending because no one bothered to explain it to them with the repetition and evocative imagery that our brains require to make an idea, particularly a paradoxical one, “stick.” Nor did anyone explain what health care reform was supposed to accomplish (other than the unbelievable and even more uninspiring claim that it would “bend the cost curve”), or why “credit card reform” had led to an increase in the interest rates they were already struggling to pay. Nor did anyone explain why saving the banks was such a priority, when saving the homes the banks were foreclosing didn’t seem to be. All Americans knew, and all they know today, is that they’re still unemployed, they’re still worried about how they’re going to pay their bills at the end of the month and their kids still can’t get a job. And now the Republicans are chipping away at unemployment insurance, and the president is making his usual impotent verbal exhortations after bargaining it away.
What makes the “deficit debate” we just experienced seem so surreal is how divorced the conversation in Washington has been from conversations around the kitchen table everywhere else in America. Although I am a scientist by training, over the last several years, as a messaging consultant to nonprofit groups and Democratic leaders, I have studied the way voters think and feel, talking to them in plain language. At this point, I have interacted in person or virtually with more than 5. Poverty Cause And Effect Essay Ideas. Americans on a range of issues, from taxes and deficits to abortion and immigration. The average voter is far more worried about jobs than about the deficit, which few were talking about while Bush and the Republican Congress were running it up. The conventional wisdom is that Americans hate government, and if you ask the question in the abstract, people will certainly give you an earful about what government does wrong.
But if you give them the choice between cutting the deficit and putting Americans back to work, it isn’t even close. But it’s not just jobs.